THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION ACTS FOR JUDICIAL PRACTICE OF UKRAINE

The article analyses the peculiarities of application standards International Labour Organization in judicial practice Ukraine. Despite fact that claimants very often, when filing lawsuits, strengthen their argumentation by referring to ILO Convention or Recommendation, these international do not form direct basis subsequent court decisions. This circumstance is viewed primarily as one resulting from tendency understanding concept labour law public law, namely, associated with cooperation states, interstate associations, organizations, and national level social partners. Its subject relations, regarding establishment implementation human rights field labour. In turn, always characterized a complex nature, which expressed combination elements legislation. So, on hand, after ratification an act, under Article 9 Constitution Ukraine it becomes part legislation future, moreover, its provisions actually function independently, but are developed legal acts But, other given no way eliminates possibility standard case non-regulation relevant issue expressly specified 81 Code. rule states that, if agreement participates establishes rules than those contained labour, applied. Taking into account enormous regulation employment relationships at state level, Ukraine, conventions recommendations appropriate, first all, cases gaps existing acts. addition, should be noted obliges each member report measures has taken apply ratified Conventions. Such reports based only legislation, also practice. strengthens role judiciary Ukraine's obligations, because results activities may affect image state. active involvement courts creates unique pool information allows develop further ways effective